Reading the Record begins with a reporting question, then gathers the strongest available evidence. We prioritize original records such as agendas, budgets, meeting minutes, contracts, filings and certified results.
We compare claims against those records, conduct interviews when possible and seek comment from people or agencies whose actions are examined. Source documents should be linked or clearly identified so readers can review the evidence themselves.
Our stories distinguish confirmed facts, disputed claims, missing context, analysis, opinion and unanswered questions. New evidence may lead to an update or correction.